INNOVATION 101
How innovation actually gets done.
Six frameworks, forty methods, organized by the problem they solve — not by how they look in a slide deck. Every framework is interactive; every method comes with enough context to know when not to use it.
THE LENSES
Six frameworks for six ways of working.
A framework is a named structure for running an innovation process from end to end — not a method (a single tool), not a metaphor. There are six here because different problems call for fundamentally different approaches.
Pick the one that fits how your problem is shaped, then use the methods inside it.
THE WORK
Forty methods, organized by the problem they solve.
Not a list to scroll, but a toolkit to deploy. Each group is for a different kind of stuck.
You don't yet know what you don't know.
The goal is to observe people in their actual context without an agenda — letting real behavior, hidden workarounds, and unspoken constraints surface before any solution is considered.
You have observations. You need insight.
Raw observations only become actionable when forced into structure — synthesis methods make patterns visible and reveal what the data is actually saying beneath the surface.
You need to see the system, not just the problem.
Most friction isn't a single broken touchpoint but the accumulated cost of how a system adds up over time — these methods map the full arc so you can intervene where it actually matters.
You know what's needed. Now generate what's possible.
A well-framed problem generates better options than open brainstorming — these methods suspend judgment long enough to reach possibilities you wouldn't find by reasoning from the obvious.
You have options. You need to make choices.
Good options don't simplify decisions — they make them harder; strategy tools force explicit criteria about which bets to place, which directions to walk away from, and why.
You have a solution. Now test it against reality.
Every solution is a hypothesis about what the world will accept — these methods put it in front of real users, real conditions, and real constraints before committing the investment to build it at scale.
WHO MADE THIS
Built by Mert Pekdemir, with Claude and Claude Code — a practitioner and an AI, on purpose.
The Practitioner
Mert Pekdemir
Design researcher and strategist at Deloitte's Innovation and Product Strategy team, formerly known as Doblin. He leads research and strategy engagements for Fortune 50 to 500 companies across financial services, healthcare, and enterprise technology.
He brought the practice and the judgment: which methods belong, where their boundaries sit, and what is honest to say about each.
The AI Collaborator
Claude & Claude Code
Claude helped draft, structure, and build the site — writing content, reasoning through editorial decisions, and translating design specs into working code via Claude Code.
It is a demonstration of the same idea the site keeps returning to — that AI is genuinely useful for fluent production, and that the judgment about what is true and what matters stays human.
